Avant que nous puissions vous montrer une liste et des photos de femmes qui vivent près de chez vous et sont prêtes à avoir des relations sexuelles dès maintenant nous devons nous poser quelques questions rapides.
Just look at it in terms of a smaller unit of time (say months, or days) and add 7 years under that unit, instead of just adding 7. I'm going to have to agree that "too-crazy-to-date" variable needs to be taken into account when considering the available pool.(At age 50 youngest possible dating subject via SCR = 32. Since most people generally are married or whatnot at this age it is usually a non-issue.But nevertheless, dating someone younger than one of your kids = really creepy.Just look at it in terms of a smaller unit of time (say months, or days) and add 7 years under that unit, instead of just adding 7. For completeness, here's links to a bar chart of the above and The number of singles in each group.Someone with better graphing software than me is welcome to make a better set.Don't date anyone who is as old as or younger than your first child.This really doesn't really come into play until around 50 or so.Or at least their competition will drop significantly. Of course those 80 year olds might go for 47 year this means that at 15, you cant date a 13 year old, which really isnt all that creepy.the formula i came up with, it is creepy for someone to be dating someone who is over 125% of their age. that formula doesnt look as cool, but it does seem right.I feel to make the properly clear I should use some statistical notation... The problem down here in south Florida is the large number of bleach-blond cookie-cutter personality types down here.But I should also be working and I'm not doing that either. It dilutes the dating pool for those of us who don't like that.